ABSTRACT
AIM: To analyze the stability of different concentrations of fluorescein sodium solution on the detection of tear break-up time(TBUT).METHODS:A retrospective study. A total of 150 cases(150 eyes)who came to our dry eye clinic with good cooperation from August 2019 to September 2021 were selected for the study, and the subjects were randomly divided into five groups, which were fluorescein sodium(FLS, 0.5%), FLS(1.0%), FLS(1.5%), FLS(2.0%)and fluorescein sodium parallel(FLSP), with 30 patients in each group(all the right eyes were the subject eyes). Each group was dripped with the corresponding fluorescein sodium. The FLSP group was the fluorescent test strip detection group. The slit lamp image scores of different concentration groups were compared, the survival time of sodium fluorescein at the instant, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 30min points was observed in each group, and the mean value of TBUT in each group was recorded.RESULTS: The image score of FLS(0.5%)group was significantly higher than that of the other four groups(t=7.746, 21.483, 116.190, 38.730, all P<0.01). The image score of FLS(1.0%)group was significantly higher than that of FLS(1.5%)and FLS(2.0%)group(t=10.742, 15.492, all P<0.01). The survival time of fluorescein in FLS(0.5%)group was significantly shorter than that of the other four groups(t=8.226, 7.458, 9.159, 12.347, all P<0.01). The survival time of fluorescein in FLS(1.5%)group was significantly longer than that of FLS(1.0%)and FLS(2.0%)group(t=15.428, 13.274, all P<0.05). TBUT in FLS(0.5%)group was significantly higher than that of the other four groups at 2min(t=22.767, 22.345, 15.494, 17.213, all P<0.01), and was significantly lower than that of the other four groups at 10min(t=23.266, 25.353, 10.183, 22.025, all P<0.01). The mean first TBUT of FLS(1.5%)group was significantly shorter than that of the other four groups(t=25.236, 21.374, 19.658, 72.341, all P<0.01), and the mean first TBUT of FLSP group was significantly longer than that of the other four groups(t=22.487, 30.267, 60.247, 40.857, all P<0.01). There was no significant correlation between TBUT and ocular surface disease index(OSDI)and tear river height(rs=-0.072, 0.219, P=0.689, 0.112). TBUT was positively correlated with tear secretion(rs=0.674, P<0.01).CONCLUSION: FLS(0.5%)had higher image quality but it was only suitable for observing staining within 5min, and the FLSP group was more suitable for clinical observation of corneal fluorescence staining for a longer period; FLS(1.5%)was the most stable and reliable concentration and dose for the detection of TBUT.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the efficacy of semiconductor low level laser irradiation for the treatment of postoperative exposure of hydroxyapatite orbital implants.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>22 cases with postoperative exposure of hydroxyapatite orbital implants were divided into three groups according to the size of implants exposure. The exposure wound in the 3 groups was irradated with semiconductor low level laser 5 min per day for 5-15 days. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 24 months.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the group with less then 3 mm of exposure, the wound healed in 1 week after 5-10 days irradiation; in the group with implant exposure of 4-7 mm, the would healed in 1-2 weeks after 10-15 days irradiation; in the group with implant exposure of 8-10 mm, the would healed in 2-3 weeks after 10-15 days irradiation. Compared with the treatments of drugs and/or surgical repair, which was used for another 20 cases of exposure of hydroxyapatite orbital implants, semiconductor low level laser increased healing rate obviously in the groups with implant exposure of 4-7 mm and 8-10 mm (P = 0.019, 0.018).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Semiconductor low level laser has better effects than drugs and/or surgical repair for exposure of hydroxyapatite orbital implants.</p>